Ok, I promise I'll try not to write too much more on this topic, as it does seem to be dominating lately. However, according to a New York Times article, it seems that 1/3 of the items that were withdrawn and reclassified since 1999 from the National Archives in the Staes did not contain sensative material. The remaining 2/3 could technically be justified but often held old secrets that are known. It begs the question, why were they withdrawn then? I have no answer for you.
- RT @pamryan: Curious why this wasn't targeted to public libraries to maximize their existing cross-Canada work in this area -- we already h… 7 hours ago
- @pabinkley @redlibrarian maintenance and support beyond initial set up is so important and yet often overlooked or ignored 16 hours ago
- @redlibrarian don’t get me started on website vs libguides (I have a guideline for that) 16 hours ago